Vladislav (Vlady) K. rejected nationalist and didactic elements in muralism for several reasons, primarily rooted in his artistic philosophy and the socio-political context of his time. Here are some key points that explain his stance:
Personal Artistic Vision: Vlady sought to create art that transcended specific national identities and political messages. He believed that art should express universal human experiences and emotions rather than serve as a tool for nationalism or propaganda.
Critique of Nationalism: Vlady was critical of the way nationalism could be used to exclude or marginalize certain groups. He felt that focusing on national identity could lead to divisiveness rather than unity, which was contrary to his vision of a more inclusive and global perspective in art.
Focus on Humanism: His work often emphasized humanist themes, exploring the complexities of the human condition rather than adhering to didactic narratives that aimed to teach or instruct the viewer. This approach allowed for a more personal and subjective interpretation of his murals.
Historical Context: The period during which Vlady was active was marked by significant political upheaval and the rise of various nationalist movements. By rejecting these elements, he positioned himself against the tide of political art that sought to promote specific ideologies, instead advocating for a more reflective and contemplative approach to muralism.
Influence of Surrealism and Abstract Art: Vlady was influenced by movements like surrealism and abstract art, which often prioritize emotional expression and the subconscious over literal representation and didacticism. This influence shaped his approach to muralism, leading him to favor abstraction and symbolism over straightforward narratives.
In summary, Vlady's rejection of nationalist and didactic elements in muralism stemmed from his desire to create art that was universal, humanistic, and reflective of deeper emotional truths rather than political agendas.