The public outcry regarding the decision not to repatriate bodies often stems from several emotional and ethical concerns:

1. Cultural and Religious Sensitivities: Many cultures and religions have specific rituals and practices surrounding death and burial. The failure to repatriate bodies can prevent families from performing these important rites, leading to distress and a sense of disrespect towards the deceased.

2. Family Closure and Grieving: For families, having the body of a loved one returned is a crucial part of the grieving process. It allows them to say their final goodbyes and find closure. Without repatriation, families may feel a prolonged sense of loss and incompleteness.

3. Perceived Lack of Compassion: Decisions against repatriation can be perceived as lacking empathy or compassion, especially if they are driven by bureaucratic, financial, or logistical reasons rather than humanitarian considerations.

4. Public and Media Pressure: Media coverage and public opinion can amplify the emotional impact of such decisions, leading to widespread outcry. Stories highlighting individual families' struggles and heartbreak can mobilize public sentiment and demand for action.

5. Political and Diplomatic Implications: In some cases, the decision not to repatriate bodies can have political or diplomatic repercussions, especially if it involves international incidents or conflicts. This can lead to public scrutiny and demands for accountability from government officials.

Overall, the decision not to repatriate bodies touches on deeply personal and societal values, leading to significant public reaction when those values are perceived to be compromised.