The proposal to demolish the Corn Exchange in the 1960s was ultimately abandoned due to a combination of public opposition, changing attitudes towards historical preservation, and the recognition of the building's architectural significance.

Initially, the Corn Exchange, built in the 19th century, was seen as outdated and not fitting the modern urban landscape envisioned at the time. However, as the 1960s progressed, there was a growing movement advocating for the preservation of historical buildings. This shift in public sentiment was influenced by a broader cultural appreciation for heritage and the architectural value of older structures.

Additionally, local campaigns and protests played a significant role in halting the demolition plans. Community members and preservationists rallied to protect the Corn Exchange, highlighting its importance as a social and economic hub in the area. The efforts of these groups, combined with the changing policies regarding urban development and historical preservation, led to the abandonment of the demolition proposal.

In summary, the decision to abandon the demolition of the Corn Exchange was influenced by public advocacy, a shift in societal values towards preservation, and recognition of the building's historical and architectural importance.