The key differences between simple and compound attacks in fencing are as follows:
Number of Actions: A simple attack is executed in a single, continuous motion directly aimed at the opponent, whereas a compound attack involves two or more actions. For example, a feint may precede the actual attack in a compound attack.
Complexity and Deception: Compound attacks are generally more complex and incorporate elements of deception, such as feints or parries, to manipulate the opponent's defense. Simple attacks are more straightforward and direct.
Starting Distance: Simple attacks typically require a shorter distance to be effective, as they lack the preparatory actions found in compound attacks. Compound attacks can be initiated from a greater distance due to their multi-step nature.
Time to Execute: Since compound attacks involve multiple actions, they generally take longer to execute than simple attacks. This can provide an opportunity for the defender to react, but also allows for more strategic manipulation of the opponent.
Rhythm Disruption: Compound attacks are often used to disrupt the opponent's rhythm or to catch them off guard by surprising them with an additional action.
Variety: Compound attacks offer a greater variety of actions that can be combined in different ways to create a multitude of attack sequences.
Sources like Wikipedia and the Bishops Prep document detail these differences, providing insight into the tactical considerations of each type of attack. For instance, the Wikipedia page on Fencing tactics and the document from Bishops Prep, FENCING THEORY, both discuss the structure and execution of simple versus compound attacks.