Reference

Robert L. Holmes critiques the relevance of analytical ethics in bioethics by suggesting that, while analytical ethics can serve an important role in clarifying issues within bioethics, it cannot replace or fully provide moral wisdom. Holmes argues that theoretical ethics should go beyond academic exercises and be shown to have practical relevance to applied morality.

The essence of Holmes' critique is captured in his work titled "The Limited Relevance of Analytical Ethics to the Problems of Bioethics," where he elaborates on the limitations of analytical ethics in addressing the complex moral situations encountered in bioethics. He believes that while analytical ethics provides valuable insights and clarification, it falls short of offering comprehensive solutions or substituting for deeper moral understanding.

For further reading, you might explore the sources such as The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy or PhilPapers which contain relevant discussions and analyses.

Here are some images related to the topic: