The stowaway's lawyer requested a media ban on asylum hearings primarily to protect the privacy and safety of the individual involved. In cases where sensitive personal information is disclosed, such as details about the stowaway's background, reasons for fleeing their home country, or potential threats they may face, a media ban can help prevent this information from being publicized. This is particularly important in asylum cases, where the applicant may be at risk of persecution or harm if their identity or circumstances are revealed.

Additionally, the lawyer may have argued that media coverage could influence the fairness of the proceedings, potentially swaying public opinion or even the decision-makers involved in the case. By limiting media access, the lawyer aims to ensure that the asylum process remains impartial and focused on the legal merits of the case rather than sensationalized media narratives.

If you need more specific details or context regarding this particular case, please let me know!